In Atomfall, the Core i5-9600KF is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Core i5-9600KF
No clear advantages
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 216 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Up to 9% cheaper – $199.99 vs $219.88
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall – $0.92 vs $1.02/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
214 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
99%
Price, $
$219.88
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
90%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
