In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-9600KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $100 more expensive!
Core i5-9600KF
No clear advantages
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 45% cheaper – $119.99 vs $219.88
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.68 vs $1.27/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
173 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
99%
Price, $
$219.88
54%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
54%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
