In Rust, the Core i5-9600KF is slightly faster than the Core i5-650. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $153 more expensive!
Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 230 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years newer
Core i5-650
- Up to 70% cheaper – $66.40 vs $219.88
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Rust – $0.31 vs $0.95/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.88
30%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
33%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
69%
Price, $
$66.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
