In Atomfall, the Core i5-9600KF is faster than the Core i5-3317U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-3317U: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-3317U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-3317U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-3317U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
57%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3317U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
