In Atomfall, the Core i5-9600KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-11400F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $17 more expensive!
Core i5-9600KF
No clear advantages
Core i5-11400F
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 223 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 8% cheaper – $203.16 vs $219.88
- Up to 8% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Atomfall – $0.91 vs $1.02/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
96%
Price, $
$219.88
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
89%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$203.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
