In Rust, the Core i5-9600K is slightly faster than the Xeon X5675. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 229 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5675
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600K vs Xeon X5675: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600K vs Xeon X5675 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600K vs Xeon X5675 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X5675
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5675 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
