In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-9600K is slightly slower than the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9600K
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5640
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600K vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
224 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
93%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600K vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600K vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
