In Deathloop, the Core i5-9600K is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 3200G. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $93 more expensive!
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Is 8 months and 17 days newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 8 months and 17 days newer
- Up to 59% cheaper – $65.98 vs $159.00
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Deathloop – $0.30 vs $0.71/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600K vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
41%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
42%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
