In Atomfall, the Core i5-9600 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9600
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
9 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
