In Starfield, the Core i5-9600 is slightly faster than the Core i7-4800MQ. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $150 more expensive!
Core i5-9600
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield – 92 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Core i7-4800MQ
- Up to 52% cheaper – $138.02 vs $288.36
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Starfield – $1.51 vs $3.13/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Starfield
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600 vs Core i7-4800MQ: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
92 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288.36
47%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
48%
Core i7-4800MQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
91 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
95%
Price, $
$138.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i7-4800MQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i7-4800MQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-4800MQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4800MQ Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $380.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG3 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 47 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
