Core i5-9600 vs Core i5-14400F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-9600 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-14400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $106.96 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-9600
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-14400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 45% cheaper – $130.00 vs $236.96
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
205
91%
Min 1% FPS
140
92%
Price, $
$236.96
54%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
50%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
225
100%
Min 1% FPS
153
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
9 MB
45%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
