In Deathloop, the Core i5-9600 is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $89 more expensive!
Core i5-9600
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 31% cheaper – $199.00 vs $288.36
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 34% better value in Deathloop – $0.87 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 34% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600 vs Core i5-11600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
220 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
97%
Price, $
$288.36
69%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
66%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
