In Baldur's Gate 3, the Core i5-9600 is slightly faster than the Core i3-3220T. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $98 more expensive!
Core i5-9600
- Up to 2% faster in Baldur's Gate 3 – 135 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Baldur's Gate 3
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 34% cheaper – $189.95 vs $288.36
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 33% better value in Baldur's Gate 3 – $1.43 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 33% better value in Baldur's Gate 3
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Baldur's Gate 3 FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600 vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
135 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288.36
65%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
67%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
132 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
96%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600 vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
