In Deathloop, the Core i5-9500T is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9500T
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 01, 2018 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-9500T vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9500T vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9500T vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9500T
Apr 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9500T Apr 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
