In Rust, the Core i5-9500T is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1260L. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9500T
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 223 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 01, 2018 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Xeon E3-1260L
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-9500T vs Xeon E3-1260L: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9500T vs Xeon E3-1260L in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9500T vs Xeon E3-1260L in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9500T
Apr 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1260L
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9500T Apr 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1260L Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 1st, 2018 | Released | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
