In Dead Space, the Core i5-9500T is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 2 years and 29 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 01, 2018
- Is 2 years and 29 days newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i5-9500T vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9500T vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9500T vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9500T
Apr 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
9 MB
45%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9500T Apr 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$192.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
