In Atomfall, the Core i5-9500T is slightly faster than the Core i7-2860QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9500T
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Apr 01, 2018 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-2860QM
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9500T vs Core i7-2860QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9500T vs Core i7-2860QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9500T vs Core i7-2860QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9500T
Apr 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-2860QM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9500T Apr 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2860QM Sep 4th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 1st, 2018 | Released | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1224 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
