In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-9500T is slightly slower than the Core i7-11700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9500T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-11700KF
- Up to 18% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 117 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 01, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-9500T vs Core i7-11700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9500T vs Core i7-11700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9500T vs Core i7-11700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9500T
Apr 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i7-11700KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9500T Apr 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 1st, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$192.00 | MSRP | $374.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
