In Atomfall, the Core i5-9500 is slightly faster than the Core i5-3330S and it's also a better value for money, as it's $13 cheaper!
Core i5-9500
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 9% cheaper – $137.10 vs $149.94
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in Atomfall – $0.64 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i5-3330S
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9500 vs Core i5-3330S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9500
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$137.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Core i5-3330S
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
91%
Price, $
$149.94
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
82%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9500 vs Core i5-3330S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9500 vs Core i5-3330S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9500
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-3330S
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9500 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3330S Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
