In Elden Ring, the Core i5-9400T is slightly slower than the Xeon X5660. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5660
- Up to 3% faster in Elden Ring – 139 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Elden Ring
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Xeon X5660: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Xeon X5660 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Xeon X5660 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X5660
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5660 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
