In Rust, the Core i5-9400T is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1240. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 219 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1240
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Xeon E3-1240: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Xeon E3-1240 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Xeon E3-1240 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1240
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1240 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
