In Dead Space, the Core i5-9400T is slightly faster than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8320
No clear advantages
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
174 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
99%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
