In Deathloop, the Core i5-9400T is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 243 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 26 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 4 years and 26 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
59%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
