In Dead Space, the Core i5-9400T is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
177 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
9 MB
47%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
