In Deathloop, the Core i5-9400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
