In The First Descendant, the Core i5-9400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 1% faster in The First Descendant – 113 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The First Descendant
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
The First Descendant FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
113 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
85 FPS
100%
Price, $
$182.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
