In Remnant II, the Core i5-9400T is slightly slower than the Core i3-3227U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-3227U
- Up to 3% faster in Remnant II – 209 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Remnant II
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Remnant II FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Core i3-3227U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i3-3227U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i3-3227U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
