In Atomfall, the Core i5-9400T is slightly faster than the Core i3-3210. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400T
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 203 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i3-3210
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400T vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
92%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400T vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
