In Atomfall, the Core i5-9400F is slightly faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400F vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
