In Atomfall, the Core i5-9400F is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $429 cheaper!
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 78% cheaper – $119.99 vs $549.00
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall – $0.57 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400F vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
85%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
21%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
26%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
