In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-9400F is slightly slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400F vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
76 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
85%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
9 MB
45%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
