Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 566 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $105.00 vs $325.00
- Up to 66% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10850K - $0.74 vs $2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 6% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-9400F - 149 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $105 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6541 minutes ago
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6541 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |