In Atomfall, the Core i5-9400F is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $463 cheaper!
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 79% cheaper – $119.99 vs $582.72
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Atomfall – $0.57 vs $2.38/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i7-13700KF
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-13700KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
86%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$582.72
20%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-13700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-13700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
9 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
