In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-9400F is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $210 cheaper!
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 64% cheaper – $119.99 vs $329.95
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in The Callisto Protocol – $0.98 vs $2.53/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in The Callisto Protocol
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 7% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 130 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
122 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
94%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
36%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
