Core i5-9400F vs Core i5-12600KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-9400F is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-12600KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $9.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-12600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 8% cheaper – $118.00 vs $127.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
202
89%
Min 1% FPS
138
89%
Price, $
$127.99
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
81%
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
228
100%
Min 1% FPS
155
100%
Price, $
$118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i5-12600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Core i5-12600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
9 MB
45%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400F | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $264.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
