In Atomfall, the Core i5-9400 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $424 cheaper!
Core i5-9400
- Up to 75% cheaper – $139.00 vs $563.41
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall – $0.66 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
84%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
24%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
29%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
