In Atomfall, the Core i5-9400 is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $391 cheaper!
Core i5-9400
- Up to 74% cheaper – $139.00 vs $529.90
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall – $0.66 vs $2.18/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
86%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.9
26%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
