In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-9400 is slightly slower than the Core i5-650 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $76 more expensive!
Core i5-9400
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 242 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 54% cheaper – $63.33 vs $139.00
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.26 vs $0.61/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
225 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
93%
Price, $
$139
45%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
43%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
