In Atomfall, the Core i5-8500T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4800MQ. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $11 more expensive!
Core i5-8500T
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Core i7-4800MQ
- Up to 7% cheaper – $138.02 vs $149.00
- Up to 7% cheaper
- Up to 7% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $0.73/FPS
- Up to 7% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-8500T vs Core i7-4800MQ: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-8500T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
93%
Core i7-4800MQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
99%
Price, $
$138.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-8500T vs Core i7-4800MQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-8500T vs Core i7-4800MQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-8500T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-4800MQ
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-8500T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4800MQ Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $380.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 47 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
