In Atomfall, the Core i5-8500T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4160. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $124 more expensive!
Core i5-8500T
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4160
- Up to 83% cheaper – $24.99 vs $149.00
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall – $0.12 vs $0.73/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-8500T vs Core i3-4160: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-8500T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
16%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
199 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
97%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-8500T vs Core i3-4160 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-8500T vs Core i3-4160 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-8500T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-8500T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
