In Deathloop, the Core i5-8400T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-8400T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-8400T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
218 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
90%
Price, $
$113.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-8400T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-8400T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-8400T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
61%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-8400T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
35W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
