In Atomfall, the Core i5-8400T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $46 cheaper!
Core i5-8400T
- Up to 29% cheaper – $113.37 vs $159.00
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall – $0.55 vs $0.74/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 months and 17 days newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 months and 17 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-8400T vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-8400T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
204 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
96%
Price, $
$113.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
71%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
74%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-8400T vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-8400T vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-8400T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-8400T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
