In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-8400 is slower than the Core i5-13600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-8400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13600KF
- Up to 25% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 126 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-8400 vs Core i5-13600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
101 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
78%
Price, $
$198.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-8400 vs Core i5-13600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-8400 vs Core i5-13600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-8400
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
9 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i5-13600KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-8400 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13600KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$182.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
