In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-8259U is slower than the Core i7-13700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-8259U
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 28 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 78% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700KF
- Up to 31% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 130 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 05, 2018
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-8259U vs Core i7-13700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$582.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-8259U vs Core i7-13700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-8259U vs Core i7-13700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-8259U
Apr 5th, 2018
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-8259U Apr 5th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 5th, 2018 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$320.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | LGA1700 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Pro Plus 655 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
