Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7640X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1592 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7640X.
Advantages of Core i5-7640X
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 112 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i5-7640X - 75 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $172.99 vs $331.31
- Up to 55% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-7640X - $2.31 vs $5.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $331.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$172.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $172.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7640X | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |