In Deathloop, the Core i5-7600T is slightly slower than the Core i9-9940X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7600T
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9940X
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-7600T vs Core i9-9940X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1288.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7600T vs Core i9-9940X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7600T vs Core i9-9940X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7600T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7600T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9940X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,387.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
