In Atomfall, the Core i5-7600T is slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7600T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-7600T vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7600T vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7600T vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7600T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7600T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
