In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-7600K is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-7600K
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 91 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-7600K vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7600K vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7600K vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7600K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7600K Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
91 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
