Core i5-7600K vs Core i3-10100 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-7600K is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $160.70 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-7600K
The Core i3-10100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-10100
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 61% cheaper – $104.75 vs $265.45
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-7600K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
138
99%
Price, $
$265.45
39%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
39%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$104.75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7600K vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7600K vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7600K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7600K | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
91 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |