The Core i5-7600 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Phenom X4 9650 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $76.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-7600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 79% cheaper – $19.95 vs $95.97
Core i5-7600 vs Phenom X4 9650 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$95.97
20%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
24%
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
88%
Min 1% FPS
110
89%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i5-7600 vs Phenom X4 9650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7600 vs Phenom X4 9650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7600 vs Phenom X4 9650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7600
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-7600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Agena |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | unknown |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |